Once, weird instruments only made the rounds at exclusive academic conferences. Now, they go viral on Facebook.

Such is the case with Collidoscope, the creation of a UK-based mixing and mastering service (out of London label Sunlightsquare Records) and Queen Mary researchers – Ben Bengler and Fiore Martin. It’s a massive tangible table-top interface to a granular instrument.

There are a few things that make this one special, even to those of us who have seen such items before.

1. It’s big. It appears that the basis of this is a very large display, cleverly built into a slick-looking table-top interface.

2. It’s visual. A crisp, clear waveform display attractively shows you where you are. Nicely executed, that.

3. It’s physical. Big knobs and faders and a keyboard set this apart from the iPad apps and whatnot that do the same – and also set up the possibility for collaboration.

4. It samples. Built-in sampling is connected to a SuperCollider engine underneath for responsive sonic control.

More here, though they’re a bit scant on details other than it’s a one-off prototype. (And the site is, sadly, orange and full of big ads! But the prototype itself is great!)

http://www.doctormix.com/blog/collidoscope

Built your own interesting granular controller? We’d love to see it.

Seems this could also be a chance to open up design ideas. Speaking of which, I really should come up with a better interface for my own mangled Pd creation and maybe clean up the patch enough that I wouldn’t be embarrassed to let anyone see it!

But really brilliant and inspiring work, lads! This raises the bar. Or, at least, the table.

Collidoscope-3

Collidoscope-6

51 responses to “Collidoscope is a giant table-top granular instrument”

  1. djhokey says:

    That is a tiny, tiny keyboard

    • Will says:

      The small keyboard seems pitch perfect for the design. Helps it feel approachable which appears to be a design goal.

      For keyboardists that want to use granular for music making, we have many many tools to plug out larger keyboards into.

  2. djhokey says:

    That is a tiny, tiny keyboard

    • Will says:

      The small keyboard seems pitch perfect for the design. Helps it feel approachable which appears to be a design goal.

      For keyboardists that want to use granular for music making, we have many many tools to plug our larger keyboards into.

  3. djhokey says:

    That is a tiny, tiny keyboard

    • Will says:

      The small keyboard seems pitch perfect for the design. Helps it feel approachable which appears to be a design goal.

      For keyboardists that want to use granular for music making, we have many many tools to plug our larger keyboards into.

  4. LFSaw says:

    If this leaves you curious trying out Granular Synthesis in SuperCollider, there are some really nice building blocks and tutorials around. Below is an (incomplete) list:

    http://doc.sccode.org/Classes/GrainBuf.html << One of many UGens in SuperCollider to do Granular (re-)synthesis

    https://mitpress.mit.edu/index.php?q=books/supercollider-book << The SuperCollider Book (also as pdf e-book) has a really great chapter on Microsound (which Granular Synthesis is part of) written by Alberto de Campo.

    https://github.com/supercollider/sc3-plugins << For the advanced user, I highly recommend looking at the UGens written by Josh Parmenter available via sc-plugins

    http://sccode.org/ << resources for SuperCollider programming, lots of examples on Synthesis etc. written in SuperCollider

  5. LFSaw says:

    If this leaves you curious trying out Granular Synthesis in SuperCollider, there are some really nice building blocks and tutorials around. Below is an (incomplete) list:

    http://doc.sccode.org/Classes/GrainBuf.html << One of many UGens in SuperCollider to do Granular (re-)synthesis

    https://mitpress.mit.edu/index.php?q=books/supercollider-book << The SuperCollider Book (also as pdf e-book) has a really great chapter on Microsound (which Granular Synthesis is part of) written by Alberto de Campo.

    https://github.com/supercollider/sc3-plugins << For the advanced user, I highly recommend looking at the UGens written by Josh Parmenter available via sc-plugins

    http://sccode.org/ << resources for SuperCollider programming, lots of examples on Synthesis etc. written in SuperCollider

    (also: http://tai-studio.org/index.php/2015/11/supercollider-and-granular-synthesis/ )

  6. LFSaw says:

    If this leaves you curious trying out Granular Synthesis in SuperCollider, there are some really nice building blocks and tutorials around. Below is an (incomplete) list:

    http://doc.sccode.org/Classes/GrainBuf.html << One of many UGens in SuperCollider to do Granular (re-)synthesis

    https://mitpress.mit.edu/index.php?q=books/supercollider-book << The SuperCollider Book (also as pdf e-book) has a really great chapter on Microsound (which Granular Synthesis is part of) written by Alberto de Campo.

    https://github.com/supercollider/sc3-plugins << For the advanced user, I highly recommend looking at the UGens written by Josh Parmenter available via sc-plugins

    http://sccode.org/ << resources for SuperCollider programming, lots of examples on Synthesis etc. written in SuperCollider

    (also: http://tai-studio.org/index.php/2015/11/supercollider-and-granular-synthesis/ )

  7. Will says:

    I so want this to become a standard family living room instrument. For now, Samplr will have to do.

    Why isn’t the world filled with those wide low res screens? I want to run a sequencer with one. Text be damned.

    • wetterberg says:

      It’s just one display with a bit of plastic across it. I suppose you can make most displays like that if you have some spare acrylic laying about 😉

      • Will says:

        Ah, good idea about the ‘split screen’. Could be right. But at that aspect ratio? Seems pretty specialized even if you look at it as a single display with a piece of plastic across the middle. And super matted finish? So easy on the eyes. Want.

  8. Will says:

    I so want this to become a standard family living room instrument. For now, Samplr will have to do.

    Why isn’t the world filled with those wide low res screens? I want to run a sequencer with one. Text be damned.

    • wetterberg says:

      It’s just one display with a bit of plastic across it. I suppose you can make most displays like that if you have some spare acrylic laying about 😉

      • Will says:

        Ah, good idea about the ‘split screen’. Could be right. But at that aspect ratio? Seems pretty specialized even if you look at it as a single display with a piece of plastic across the middle. And super matted finish? So easy on the eyes. Want.

  9. Will says:

    I so want this to become a standard family living room instrument. For now, Samplr will have to do.

    Why isn’t the world filled with those wide low res screens? I want to run a sequencer with one. Text be damned.

    • wetterberg says:

      It’s just one display with a bit of plastic across it. I suppose you can make most displays like that if you have some spare acrylic laying about 😉

      • Will says:

        Ah, good idea about the ‘split screen’. Could be right. But at that aspect ratio? Seems pretty specialized even if you look at it as a single display with a piece of plastic across the middle. And super matted finish? So easy on the eyes. Want.

  10. DJ Hombre says:

    That screen is a digital DJ’s wet dream. It would also help in a club environment, so clubbers would know the DJ is not just checking his email when “Serato-face” occurs.

  11. DJ Hombre says:

    That screen is a digital DJ’s wet dream. It would also help in a club environment, so clubbers would know the DJ is not just checking his email when “Serato-face” occurs.

  12. DJ Hombre says:

    That screen is a digital DJ’s wet dream. It would also help in a club environment, so clubbers would know the DJ is not just checking his email when “Serato-face” occurs.

  13. Nathanaël says:

    I’m really curious how the screen works, is it basically one giant flat panel ? I doubt you can find screens as wide as these ones….

  14. Nathanaël says:

    I’m really curious how the screen works, is it basically one giant flat panel ? I doubt you can find screens as wide as these ones….

  15. Nathanaël says:

    I’m really curious how the screen works, is it basically one giant flat panel ? I doubt you can find screens as wide as these ones….

  16. Robin Parmar says:

    I don’t get it. It’s a big display, yeah but at crazy low resolution. A smaller crisper display would be much cheaper. Unless this is touch enabled? But it isn’t. Can’t I do all this on my laptop? In a much more portable and standardised configuration? I am all for new interfaces, but they have to offer something new.

    • wetterberg says:

      I think it’s probably plenty “crisp”, the waveform just isn’t rendered all that well. Other than that I’d tend to agree.

    • Will says:

      I think the mix up here is the ‘offer’. In particular, this isn’t a studied exploration in granular synthesis for musicians. It’s a big approachable and lovely looking Casio SK1. Music for the Masses, etc.

  17. Robin Parmar says:

    I don’t get it. It’s a big display, yeah but at crazy low resolution. A smaller crisper display would be much cheaper. Unless this is touch enabled? But it isn’t. Can’t I do all this on my laptop? In a much more portable and standardised configuration? I am all for new interfaces, but they have to offer something new.

    • wetterberg says:

      I think it’s probably plenty “crisp”, the waveform just isn’t rendered all that well. Other than that I’d tend to agree.

    • Will says:

      I think the mix up here is the ‘offer’. In particular, this isn’t a studied exploration in granular synthesis for musicians. It’s a big approachable and lovely looking Casio SK1. Music for the Masses, etc.

  18. Robin Parmar says:

    I don’t get it. It’s a big display, yeah but at crazy low resolution. A smaller crisper display would be much cheaper. Unless this is touch enabled? But it isn’t. Can’t I do all this on my laptop? In a much more portable and standardised configuration? I am all for new interfaces, but they have to offer something new.

    • wetterberg says:

      I think it’s probably plenty “crisp”, the waveform just isn’t rendered all that well. Other than that I’d tend to agree.

    • Will says:

      I think the mix up here is the ‘offer’. In particular, this isn’t a studied exploration in granular synthesis for musicians. It’s a big approachable and lovely looking Casio SK1. Music for the Masses, etc.

  19. wetterberg says:

    I must admit to wanting to not like this, but still swooning a bit. Must be all the little disciplines involved in making it happen. It’s not, however, granular anything, in my book. It’s just a sampler. The “make the loop really small and move it about” thing would more accurately be called wavescanning, or even wavetable synthesis in a pinch. IDK, the clouds of grains is kind of a big deal in granular, this doesn’t have any of that, not even a crossfaded loop, it sounds like.

    This is a good thing, though. This means the people who hear this sort of sound can achieve it with so many tools available right now; soft- and hardware.

  20. wetterberg says:

    I must admit to wanting to not like this, but still swooning a bit. Must be all the little disciplines involved in making it happen. It’s not, however, granular anything, in my book. It’s just a sampler. The “make the loop really small and move it about” thing would more accurately be called wavescanning, or even wavetable synthesis in a pinch. IDK, the clouds of grains is kind of a big deal in granular, this doesn’t have any of that, not even a crossfaded loop, it sounds like.

    This is a good thing, though. This means the people who hear this sort of sound can achieve it with so many tools available right now; soft- and hardware.

  21. wetterberg says:

    I must admit to wanting to not like this, but still swooning a bit. Must be all the little disciplines involved in making it happen. It’s not, however, granular anything, in my book. It’s just a sampler. The “make the loop really small and move it about” thing would more accurately be called wavescanning, or even wavetable synthesis in a pinch. IDK, the clouds of grains is kind of a big deal in granular, this doesn’t have any of that, not even a crossfaded loop, it sounds like.

    This is a good thing, though. This means the people who hear this sort of sound can achieve it with so many tools available right now; soft- and hardware.

  22. heinrichz says:

    A harware version of Reaktor’s Travelizer.

  23. heinrichz says:

    A harware version of Reaktor’s Travelizer.

  24. heinrichz says:

    A harware version of Reaktor’s Travelizer.

  25. Polite Society says:

    I love the whole slide/twist mechanism for controlling the start end point. i think i might try and replicate this on my QuNeo.

  26. Polite Society says:

    I love the whole slide/twist mechanism for controlling the start end point. i think i might try and replicate this on my QuNeo.

  27. Polite Society says:

    I love the whole slide/twist mechanism for controlling the start end point. i think i might try and replicate this on my QuNeo.

  28. Dubby Labby says:

    Reminds me to the vestax faderboard sampler side.

  29. Dubby Labby says:

    Reminds me to the vestax faderboard sampler side.

  30. Dubby Labby says:

    Reminds me to the vestax faderboard sampler side.

Leave a Reply to Nathanaël Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *